It's weird, because a couple years ago, I wrote a test article (2500 words) for a company about the Mandela effect and deja vu. Here's a part about perceiving it:
"A distant cousin to the Mandela Effect is déjà vu. Some scientists believe there may be a connection between them in that they are simply manifestations of anomalous brain function. Theoretical physicist, Michio Kaku, put forward his theory for déjà vu, using the analogy of the radio. When you are listening to one radio station, you are tuned into one frequency. However, that radio is still receiving all the other frequencies at once. You are just tuned into one frequency. As the co-founder of string theory, Kaku believes humans are also ‘vibrating waves’ and that we can perceive and resonate with the frequencies of other universes. Hence the cause of both the Mandela Effect and déjà vu could be our brains receiving extra-universal frequencies."
So, could your save states or hypermanifest state be detected on certain 'frequencies' of some known or unknown detectors (e.g. brain waves, particles, black holes, pulsars, etc)? And would those detectors double as save state stations.
In other words, are save state conditions constant, like saving a doc on a computer or like an off-ramp on a highway where only certain circumstances can be saved at junction points. I would liken this to Doctor Who being able to go anywhere and save anything in time and space compared to the show 'The Lazarus Project' where world-ending events can only be revisited/saved?
Some questions:
1. would the save state be local or universal?
2. would this lead to multiversal branching?
3. Is the metaverse the beginning of your hypermanifest?
There's a lot to take in, but I think entanglement has a lot to say especially when involving the brain's emergent abilities. And I haven't even gone into the hologram theory and how/if that is connected to the simulation theory.
So, now my head hurts thinking about it all, but it's so very interesting.
Hi Ray, thank you so much for your response - I love this!
At the moment, I've been thinking about the holographic principle in terms of how the universe could be structured and perceived - which could generate some leads as to where the save states might lie. If the universe is holographic, then a save state wouldn't be stored in one place but be imprinted on the entire structure of reality.
It reminds me of a version of block space-time, where everything is everywhere all at once. Maybe then we can tune in and out of these frequencies/realities (brain waves, entangled particles, black holes) so that save states could be retrievable/accessible through different resonance points, like you and Michio Kaku mention! Maybe the branches are already there; we just have to access them! It seems like a medium of both determinism and freewill - the structure is set up, but we choose where to go/navigate?
I really like the metaverse as a model of the hypermanifest - taken to its extreme form, it really does seem to sync up to simulated realities! If people increasingly prefer their digital existence over our so-called 'base' reality, could that be a sign that we are shifting toward a new paradigm of reality itself?
Yes, the perception of the holographic structure and perception is a sticking point if the holostate structure is situated at the bounds of the universe. Even thinking in terms of an interface to control it would be unimaginable.
It would be interesting to believe that this whole 'universal manifestation' is real and that we can think our own reality into being. But who then gets to decide what is reality? Would it be a personal reality or affect everyone else? Then the save state becomes purely mentally controllable with no physical interface and as you say imprinted everywhere for everyone. We just have to tune into it.
Like you said, the metaverse would be a good starting point to test these theories. Lol, at a conference I was at, our reality was called the 'default' world. With 5 and the 6G there's going to be an assault on metaverse, holographics, and AR/VR technologies and I'm sure testing of the holographic principle to create or at least try to visualise how to create autonomous VR life will begin in earnest.
There's a show on Netflix called 'Pantheon'. Such ideas about being downloaded into AI systems post-death are prevalent now, but to me it raised the issue about what it means to be human. Is humanness about our bodies, minds, or consciousness? We could create our own worlds when uploaded, so it would seem control/navigation lies in the mental state, an emergent ability. Above we talked about the technology, but perhaps, the next step comes with evolution, natural or human-forced. So, either way, we're a long way from that.
I completely agree: it's an important distinction to make whether reality tuning is an individual or collective experience. Could it be a single-player or multiplayer reality? If multiple realities exist, are we each navigating our own versions or are we all tuning into fixed, shared channels that shape a "consensus" reality? The latter would probably be more computationally efficient!
The mention of a "default reality" at that conference is so interesting! It suggests that either we haven’t yet built supplementary ones, or that we’re already inside one. Even if we can never prove that we’re in a base reality now, the fact that we could eventually create simulated worlds so immersive that we couldn’t tell the difference (or even prefer them) is significant in itself. That alone could be considered a form of the hypermanifest.
I definitely need to watch Pantheon! It reminds me of the Ship of Theseus argument. If we’re uploaded, are we still ourselves, a new form of life, or just data ghosts of our past selves?
Ha, I like the Ship of Theseus idea. Maybe the universe has been written over so many times that the ink flows through leaving us ghostly images.
The consensus reality does seem more realistic. The individual multiverse would be messy and probably wasteful. But saying that, entropy is the way of the universe, and we humans are chaotic.
I don't think we'll ever know if we're in a simulation or not. There'll be some psychic/physical barrier that would prevent us from knowing to protect the simulation, even if someone told us or showed us we wouldn't believe them. It'll be like a hypermanifest paradox preventing self-awareness in a simulation...
Hi Suzie, I liked the read, thanks.
It's weird, because a couple years ago, I wrote a test article (2500 words) for a company about the Mandela effect and deja vu. Here's a part about perceiving it:
"A distant cousin to the Mandela Effect is déjà vu. Some scientists believe there may be a connection between them in that they are simply manifestations of anomalous brain function. Theoretical physicist, Michio Kaku, put forward his theory for déjà vu, using the analogy of the radio. When you are listening to one radio station, you are tuned into one frequency. However, that radio is still receiving all the other frequencies at once. You are just tuned into one frequency. As the co-founder of string theory, Kaku believes humans are also ‘vibrating waves’ and that we can perceive and resonate with the frequencies of other universes. Hence the cause of both the Mandela Effect and déjà vu could be our brains receiving extra-universal frequencies."
So, could your save states or hypermanifest state be detected on certain 'frequencies' of some known or unknown detectors (e.g. brain waves, particles, black holes, pulsars, etc)? And would those detectors double as save state stations.
In other words, are save state conditions constant, like saving a doc on a computer or like an off-ramp on a highway where only certain circumstances can be saved at junction points. I would liken this to Doctor Who being able to go anywhere and save anything in time and space compared to the show 'The Lazarus Project' where world-ending events can only be revisited/saved?
Some questions:
1. would the save state be local or universal?
2. would this lead to multiversal branching?
3. Is the metaverse the beginning of your hypermanifest?
There's a lot to take in, but I think entanglement has a lot to say especially when involving the brain's emergent abilities. And I haven't even gone into the hologram theory and how/if that is connected to the simulation theory.
So, now my head hurts thinking about it all, but it's so very interesting.
Ray
Hi Ray, thank you so much for your response - I love this!
At the moment, I've been thinking about the holographic principle in terms of how the universe could be structured and perceived - which could generate some leads as to where the save states might lie. If the universe is holographic, then a save state wouldn't be stored in one place but be imprinted on the entire structure of reality.
It reminds me of a version of block space-time, where everything is everywhere all at once. Maybe then we can tune in and out of these frequencies/realities (brain waves, entangled particles, black holes) so that save states could be retrievable/accessible through different resonance points, like you and Michio Kaku mention! Maybe the branches are already there; we just have to access them! It seems like a medium of both determinism and freewill - the structure is set up, but we choose where to go/navigate?
I really like the metaverse as a model of the hypermanifest - taken to its extreme form, it really does seem to sync up to simulated realities! If people increasingly prefer their digital existence over our so-called 'base' reality, could that be a sign that we are shifting toward a new paradigm of reality itself?
Would love to hear your thoughts on this!
Suzie
Hi Suzie,
Yes, the perception of the holographic structure and perception is a sticking point if the holostate structure is situated at the bounds of the universe. Even thinking in terms of an interface to control it would be unimaginable.
It would be interesting to believe that this whole 'universal manifestation' is real and that we can think our own reality into being. But who then gets to decide what is reality? Would it be a personal reality or affect everyone else? Then the save state becomes purely mentally controllable with no physical interface and as you say imprinted everywhere for everyone. We just have to tune into it.
Like you said, the metaverse would be a good starting point to test these theories. Lol, at a conference I was at, our reality was called the 'default' world. With 5 and the 6G there's going to be an assault on metaverse, holographics, and AR/VR technologies and I'm sure testing of the holographic principle to create or at least try to visualise how to create autonomous VR life will begin in earnest.
There's a show on Netflix called 'Pantheon'. Such ideas about being downloaded into AI systems post-death are prevalent now, but to me it raised the issue about what it means to be human. Is humanness about our bodies, minds, or consciousness? We could create our own worlds when uploaded, so it would seem control/navigation lies in the mental state, an emergent ability. Above we talked about the technology, but perhaps, the next step comes with evolution, natural or human-forced. So, either way, we're a long way from that.
Ray
Hi Ray, thank you so much for this!
I completely agree: it's an important distinction to make whether reality tuning is an individual or collective experience. Could it be a single-player or multiplayer reality? If multiple realities exist, are we each navigating our own versions or are we all tuning into fixed, shared channels that shape a "consensus" reality? The latter would probably be more computationally efficient!
The mention of a "default reality" at that conference is so interesting! It suggests that either we haven’t yet built supplementary ones, or that we’re already inside one. Even if we can never prove that we’re in a base reality now, the fact that we could eventually create simulated worlds so immersive that we couldn’t tell the difference (or even prefer them) is significant in itself. That alone could be considered a form of the hypermanifest.
I definitely need to watch Pantheon! It reminds me of the Ship of Theseus argument. If we’re uploaded, are we still ourselves, a new form of life, or just data ghosts of our past selves?
Ha, I like the Ship of Theseus idea. Maybe the universe has been written over so many times that the ink flows through leaving us ghostly images.
The consensus reality does seem more realistic. The individual multiverse would be messy and probably wasteful. But saying that, entropy is the way of the universe, and we humans are chaotic.
I don't think we'll ever know if we're in a simulation or not. There'll be some psychic/physical barrier that would prevent us from knowing to protect the simulation, even if someone told us or showed us we wouldn't believe them. It'll be like a hypermanifest paradox preventing self-awareness in a simulation...
Food for though 🙂